Posted on May 19th, 2011 by Admin
While many hospital marketers have already accepted and/or embraced the use of social media, there continue to be holdouts in the "C-suite" who struggle to accept social media as a valid strategic tool. Why this reluctance? I have a theory...
By now most of us are familiar with the "five stages of grief" identified by psychologist Elisabeth Kübler-Ross. I suspect that as modern marketers struggle with the "death" of outdated marketing strategies, the same five stages can be applied to their reluctance to embrace the new medium of social media.
Stage 1: Denial
At first, hospital leadership has a tendency to deny the very fact that social media greatly impacts how people search online for healthcare information. Rather than accept that
...hospital leaders continue to reject the mainstream use of social media.
Examples: "No one uses social media to look for health problems." . . . "Why would anyone look at YouTube for hospitals? It's preposterous!!" . . . "Twitter is only for leaking unverified news stories and facilitating revolutions in the Middle East – not for healthcare!"
Stage 2: Anger
Once they start to see past this denial, the next phase reluctant hospital executives face is extreme anger at the very existence of social media. At this stage, there is a tendency to react with irrational behavior, outrageous litigation and general discontent with the web (as a marketing vehicle) itself.
Posted on March 9th, 2011 by Admin
We've all bought Groupons for a wide variety of goods and services -- dinner at a new restaurant, a periodical subscription, clothing, a hot air balloon ride -- but most of us have not bought a Groupon for health care services.
Thus far, the health care offerings via Groupon seem to be limited mostly to cosmetic, dental, chiropractic and acupuncture services; in short, to services that are often excluded from traditional health care insurance coverage. In an age of on-line communications and marketing of health care services, it is natural to ask whether Groupon can work for other health care services, and in fact I was asked just that last week by American Medical News. The answer: it depends.
Since health care services are heavily regulated at the state and federal level, and since health care insurance companies add another layer of restrictions in their contractual language with health care providers, there are legal issues that have to be examined before deciding to go with Groupon, LivingSocial or other similar services, in addition to the business issues at hand. The latter include: Is the cost a worthwhile investment in marketing and brand awareness? Do I need a loss leader to bring new folks in the door and/or to cover some fixed costs at slow times of the day or of the week? Is this the most cost-effective way to achieve my business goals?
There are a number of legal issues, and their resolution will depend, in part, on where you are situated, since many of the relevant rules are state laws, which vary. For example:
In short, you need to keep in mind that the use of popular social media tools in the health care space may trigger issues for health care providers far beyond the realms of HIPAA, privacy and medical practice issues, the legal bogeymen we tend to focus on when thinking about health care social media.
David Harlow (@healthblawg) is Principal of The Harlow Group LLC, a health care law and consulting firm based near Boston, Mass. He is a member of the External Advisory Board for the Mayo Clinic Center for Social Media.